.
Feedback

Pols Push for Board of Elections Overhaul

After New Yorkers dealt with problems at polling sites Tuesday, officials agree the election system needs work.

After many New Yorkers dealt with at polling locations on Tuesday, elected officials and government watchdog groups are pushing for an election process overhaul, according to the New York Times.

Christine Quinn, current City Council speaker and possible mayoral contender, said the city’s election process needed a “major soup-to-nuts overhaul” and that the Council had plans to lobby Albany for change.

On Wednesday City Councilman Jumaane Williams, D-Ditmas Park, said the board, "succeeded at failing beyond [his] wildest expectations."

City Councilman Eric Ulrich, R-Howard Beach, slammed the board while voting on Tuesday, saying they had let partisanship trump citizenship.

"Expecting people to walk, in some cases, 30 or 40 blocks to their new polling site, not informing them of their poll site, not deciding what their poll site will be until last night at six o'clock, I think the board has once again proven it's not fit to conduct these elections," Ulrich said.

But overhauling the process may not be so simple.

The State Constitution outlines how state elections are managed, requiring that Republicans and Democrats be equally represented at all levels of election administration. In New York City, the 10 Board of Elections members are recommended by the Democratic and Republican Party committees in each of the five boroughs and then confirmed by the City Council. Both parties are also in charge to choosing staff members.

Mayor Michael Bloomberg, a vocal critic of the Board of Elections, argued that the system is set up so that it’s “county leaders picking their buddies” to oversee the voting process. 

Changing this system would require state legislation, if not an amendment to the State Constitution, according to the paper.

Some elected officials have suggested changes on a smaller-scale that would make voting in New York easier.

Sheldon Silver, speaker of the Assembly; Bill de Blasio, public advocate; and Scott Stringer, Manhattan Borough President, all endorse allowing early voting – de Blasio would also like to see legislation allowing same-day voter registration, as well.

The City Council will hold a hearing on Dec. 5 to look at Election Day problems, which included jammed or broken ballot scanners, poll sites that ran out of affidavit ballots, and long lines that caused a wait of hours for many New Yorkers to vote.

What was your Election Day experience? Do you think New Yorkers will be too disenfranchised to vote in the next election after the problems this year? Share your thoughts in the comments.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Forest Hills Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Angela DeRusha April 30, 2013 at 12:11 pm
Hey Kyle, if we can get enough people I am will to do a 6 or 6:30am class as well as a 6:30pm class.Read More The cost per class is between $15-20 (depending on the size of the class) the more people the lower the individual cost.
Kyle Christine Smith April 30, 2013 at 12:00 pm
do you have any more information?
Phony Jones April 30, 2013 at 04:11 pm
Fair usage of public roads is fine, the main issue at hand is that the design of the new bike linesRead More on Jewel Ave is just poor and unsafe for all parties involved. On the eastbound Jewel Ave road heading towards Main St, the bike like is just haphazardly running along next to the merge lane to the GCP westbound lane, meaning vehicle traffic cuts directly across the new bike lane when getting onto a highway. This is very dangerous since because there are only 2 lanes now on the eastbound Jewel road the right lane becomes the de-facto bus lane for the Q65. That bus moves pretty quick in general. Any driver attempting to make the merge onto the GCP west with a bike rider directly in the merge/bike lane combined with a fast, slow to brake bus behind them will be hard pressed to slow down in time and not cause some kind of accident. Why would anybody design that kind of traffic pattern, it's dangerous and reckless. It's not much better going on the Westbound Jewel Ave Road since that bike lane also merges with the GCP exit ramp with cars exiting from highway speed. It is not a safe traffic pattern at all for anyone. Aside from that, the westbound bike lane just sort ends abruptly there as well, leaving bicyclists basically at the end of an off-ramp without a clear traffic lane. They really should have thought out the placement and layout before somebody gets hurt, especially as the weather becomes better and we see more mixed usage on the road.
el jefe April 29, 2013 at 03:31 pm
Mary, I follow the rules of the road. If I wear a helmet will you and other drivers stop speedingRead More and running red lights? An average of 17 cyclists are killed every year by drivers. not once has a driver been injured when hitting a cyclist. Do you really think we're not paying attention? You're using your car to get somewhere. That's fine. I'm using a bike to get somewhere. Please respect my right to use the road.
Mary Colliton April 29, 2013 at 02:43 pm
No not thinly veiled attempts. Real attempts. When bikers start adhering to the rules of the road,Read More wearing helmets and paying attention they'll be taken seriously. Until then ... got to the park!