.
Feedback

Rabbis and Jewish Orgs Sue City Over Circumcision Consent Forms

A spokesman says the Department of Health is trying to "enforce erroneous opinions" by requiring consent.

Three rabbis and several Jewish organizations fired back at city Department of Health circumcision regulations set to take effect later this month with a lawsuit claiming that there isn’t “any definitive proof” that the ritual practices are a health risk, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Last month, the New York City Board of Health passed a regulation requiring consent from parents before an infant can undergo a special circumcision ritual known as “metzitzah b’peh” in which the rabbi performing the procedure uses his mouth to remove blood from the incision wound.

The regulation is set to take effect on Oct. 21, and will require consent forms signed by the parents of the child accepting that the ritual “exposes the infant to risk of transmission of herpes simplex virus infection and other infectious diseases.” The mohelim would be required to retain copies of the forms for at least a year and make the records available upon request from DOH officials. 

The Central Rabbinical Congress of the USA and Canada, Agudath Israel of America, International Bris Association and three rabbis filed suit in Manhattan federal court this week, charging that the new rules will force people to convey information they do not believe. 

“Not only is the Department of Health wrong about metzitzah b’peh, it is trying to enforce erroneous opinions on the people of New York City,” Hank Sheinkopf, a spokesman representing those filing the lawsuit, told the Journal. “By essentially starting a public intimidation campaign that forces private citizens to spread the government’s beliefs, they are shaking the core of our democracy. We believe the courts will stop this overzealous government overreach and keep them out of our speech and religion.”

According to the DOH, between 2004 and 2011, there were 11 confirmed cases of infants contracting herpes simplex virus infection after direct oral suction during a circumcision. Two of the children died, and at least two others suffered brain damage, according to the paper.

Do you agree with the decision to require parental consent? Let us know what you think in the comments.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Forest Hills Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Angela DeRusha April 30, 2013 at 12:11 pm
Hey Kyle, if we can get enough people I am will to do a 6 or 6:30am class as well as a 6:30pm class.Read More The cost per class is between $15-20 (depending on the size of the class) the more people the lower the individual cost.
Kyle Christine Smith April 30, 2013 at 12:00 pm
do you have any more information?
Phony Jones April 30, 2013 at 04:11 pm
Fair usage of public roads is fine, the main issue at hand is that the design of the new bike linesRead More on Jewel Ave is just poor and unsafe for all parties involved. On the eastbound Jewel Ave road heading towards Main St, the bike like is just haphazardly running along next to the merge lane to the GCP westbound lane, meaning vehicle traffic cuts directly across the new bike lane when getting onto a highway. This is very dangerous since because there are only 2 lanes now on the eastbound Jewel road the right lane becomes the de-facto bus lane for the Q65. That bus moves pretty quick in general. Any driver attempting to make the merge onto the GCP west with a bike rider directly in the merge/bike lane combined with a fast, slow to brake bus behind them will be hard pressed to slow down in time and not cause some kind of accident. Why would anybody design that kind of traffic pattern, it's dangerous and reckless. It's not much better going on the Westbound Jewel Ave Road since that bike lane also merges with the GCP exit ramp with cars exiting from highway speed. It is not a safe traffic pattern at all for anyone. Aside from that, the westbound bike lane just sort ends abruptly there as well, leaving bicyclists basically at the end of an off-ramp without a clear traffic lane. They really should have thought out the placement and layout before somebody gets hurt, especially as the weather becomes better and we see more mixed usage on the road.
el jefe April 29, 2013 at 03:31 pm
Mary, I follow the rules of the road. If I wear a helmet will you and other drivers stop speedingRead More and running red lights? An average of 17 cyclists are killed every year by drivers. not once has a driver been injured when hitting a cyclist. Do you really think we're not paying attention? You're using your car to get somewhere. That's fine. I'm using a bike to get somewhere. Please respect my right to use the road.
Mary Colliton April 29, 2013 at 02:43 pm
No not thinly veiled attempts. Real attempts. When bikers start adhering to the rules of the road,Read More wearing helmets and paying attention they'll be taken seriously. Until then ... got to the park!