.
Feedback

Local Pols Crusade Against Borough Hall Statue

Weiner, Ferreras say 'Triumph of Civic Virtue' is sexist in its depiction of women.

A prominent Queens statue is getting a much closer look this week, now that , D-Forest Hills, and City Councilwoman Julissa Ferreras, D-Jackson Heights, are urging the city to dismantle it and sell it on Craigslist.

The statue in question, a two-story tall depiction of a nearly-nude man with a sword standing over the bodies of two women, is entitled “The Triumph of Civic Virtue.” Local leaders said it should come down because of its depiction of female forms.

The statue, commissioned in the early 20th Century, originally stood in front of City Hall in Manhattan, but was removed and placed at its current location — in a park adjacent to Queens Borough Hall — by Mayor Fiorello LaGuardia in 1941.

“Mayor LaGuardia had it right when he banished this offensive statue from City Hall Park,” Weiner said. “Queens residents don’t want this sitting in our backyard any longer. This statue is neither civil nor virtuous — and it’s time for it to go.”

According to information from the Kew Gardens Civic Association, LaGuardia was sick of the statue not because of its depiction of women, but because the statue's bare rear end faced the City Hall entrance that he used every day.

Weiner said the original plan was to post the statue on online auction house eBay, but that they “couldn’t find an employee of the UPS store willing to give us a price estimate on the shipping.”

Ferreras, who chairs the women’s issues committee in the City Council, said that 70 years is long enough for the statue to stay in Queens.

“One of the biggest things we do in my office is make sure that women go to the Family Justice Center after they’ve been identified as victims of domestic violence. That’s the very center that’s one block from here,” Ferreras said. “So women get off of this subway stop, and have to look at this statue twenty-feet high of a man stepping on two women, and then have to go and get services on domestic violence a block away.”

When asked why now was the time to crusade for the removal of the statue, Weiner cited the current political climate in Washington. He said that recent attempts to make changes to the Hyde amendment — which prohibits federal funding for abortions — and the defunding of Planned Parenthood represent an assault on women that should be met with resistance.

At Friday’s press conference, several opponents of the statue's removal said it does not depict oppression of women, but man’s triumph over allegorical obstacles. One protestor claimed the statue is not sexist, because the bodies being stepped on are serpents, representing vice, that have taken the form of women.

Weiner said that if the city fails to find an estate or collector interested in the statue, it should consider finding a tarp to drape over it.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Forest Hills Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Angela DeRusha April 30, 2013 at 12:11 pm
Hey Kyle, if we can get enough people I am will to do a 6 or 6:30am class as well as a 6:30pm class.Read More The cost per class is between $15-20 (depending on the size of the class) the more people the lower the individual cost.
Kyle Christine Smith April 30, 2013 at 12:00 pm
do you have any more information?
Phony Jones April 30, 2013 at 04:11 pm
Fair usage of public roads is fine, the main issue at hand is that the design of the new bike linesRead More on Jewel Ave is just poor and unsafe for all parties involved. On the eastbound Jewel Ave road heading towards Main St, the bike like is just haphazardly running along next to the merge lane to the GCP westbound lane, meaning vehicle traffic cuts directly across the new bike lane when getting onto a highway. This is very dangerous since because there are only 2 lanes now on the eastbound Jewel road the right lane becomes the de-facto bus lane for the Q65. That bus moves pretty quick in general. Any driver attempting to make the merge onto the GCP west with a bike rider directly in the merge/bike lane combined with a fast, slow to brake bus behind them will be hard pressed to slow down in time and not cause some kind of accident. Why would anybody design that kind of traffic pattern, it's dangerous and reckless. It's not much better going on the Westbound Jewel Ave Road since that bike lane also merges with the GCP exit ramp with cars exiting from highway speed. It is not a safe traffic pattern at all for anyone. Aside from that, the westbound bike lane just sort ends abruptly there as well, leaving bicyclists basically at the end of an off-ramp without a clear traffic lane. They really should have thought out the placement and layout before somebody gets hurt, especially as the weather becomes better and we see more mixed usage on the road.
el jefe April 29, 2013 at 03:31 pm
Mary, I follow the rules of the road. If I wear a helmet will you and other drivers stop speedingRead More and running red lights? An average of 17 cyclists are killed every year by drivers. not once has a driver been injured when hitting a cyclist. Do you really think we're not paying attention? You're using your car to get somewhere. That's fine. I'm using a bike to get somewhere. Please respect my right to use the road.
Mary Colliton April 29, 2013 at 02:43 pm
No not thinly veiled attempts. Real attempts. When bikers start adhering to the rules of the road,Read More wearing helmets and paying attention they'll be taken seriously. Until then ... got to the park!